Would You Tell Your Employees How Much You Make? The Radical Transparency Dilemma

Pay transparency is one of the most controversial aspects of workplace transparency. While some companies openly share salary data, most still keep compensation details confidential—often out of fear that disclosure could create resentment or turnover. But does withholding salary information actually cause more harm than good? In this post, we explore the radical transparency dilemma—whether organizations should share salary data, the risks and benefits of pay transparency, and how leaders can navigate this complex issue without losing employee trust.

Would You Tell Your Employees How Much You Make? The Radical Transparency Dilemma

Transparency sounds great in theory—until it comes to salaries. While organizations are embracing openness in many areas, compensation remains a deeply guarded secret in most workplaces.

The idea of pay transparency sparks strong reactions. Some argue that sharing salary information builds trust, reduces pay inequity, and fosters a fairer work environment. Others fear that disclosing salaries will create resentment, fuel turnover, and lead to constant salary negotiations.

So, should companies go all-in on pay transparency, or does some level of confidentiality serve a purpose? Let’s break down both sides of the debate, the risks of keeping salaries secret, and how organizations can approach transparency in a way that strengthens trust rather than undermining it.

The Case for Radical Pay Transparency

Proponents of full pay transparency argue that employees deserve to know how much their colleagues—and even their CEO—are making. Here’s why:

✅ It Eliminates Pay Gaps

• Salary secrecy has historically allowed gender and racial pay gaps to persist. When salaries are publicly available, inequities become impossible to ignore—and easier to fix.

• Example: After Buffer, a social media company, published its full salary data, the company took swift action to adjust pay gaps that had gone unnoticed.

✅ It Reduces Salary Anxiety

• Employees often speculate about whether they’re being underpaid. Transparency removes the mystery and reduces the resentment caused by uncertainty.

• Example: A survey by Payscale found that workers who believed they were underpaid were 50% more likely to leave their jobs—even when their salaries were actually fair.

✅ It Builds Organizational Trust

• Transparency signals that leadership isn’t hiding anything. When employees feel informed, they trust leadership more and engage more deeply in their work.

• Example: Whole Foods allows employees to see salary data across the company, creating a culture of trust and openness.

✅ It Encourages Performance-Based Compensation

• When salaries are transparent, employees can see how pay is linked to performance, encouraging a stronger meritocracy.

Sounds good, right? But before you rush to publish every employee’s salary, let’s talk about the downsides of radical transparency.

The Risks of Full Pay Transparency

Despite the benefits, many leaders fear that open salary disclosure will do more harm than good. Here’s why:

🚨 It Can Create Resentment

• Even when salaries are fair, employees often feel they deserve more. Seeing co-workers’ pay can trigger dissatisfaction, especially if job responsibilities seem similar but salaries differ.

• Example: A European tech firm implemented pay transparency but faced internal conflict when employees started comparing salaries without considering experience, tenure, or specialization.

🚨 It Leads to Constant Salary Negotiations

• When salaries are public, every employee has leverage to challenge their pay—which can create ongoing pay disputes that drain leadership’s time and resources.

• Example: A startup that implemented full transparency saw a surge in salary negotiation requests, leading to internal instability.

🚨 It Doesn’t Account for Context

• Salaries aren’t always a simple numbers game. Bonuses, stock options, experience, and location all impact compensation. But when employees only see the base salary number, they may feel underpaid—even when their total compensation is competitive.

• Example: A company with remote employees struggled after salary transparency revealed pay differences based on cost of living—some workers felt they were being shortchanged.

🚨 It Can Limit Hiring Flexibility

• Companies sometimes offer higher salaries to secure top talent in competitive markets. But if salary data is public, existing employees may demand raises just because a new hire earns more.

How to Approach Pay Transparency Without Chaos

Given these risks, many companies hesitate to adopt full pay transparency. But that doesn’t mean the only option is secrecy. The key is to strike a balance that builds trust without fueling resentment. Here’s how:

🔹 Set Clear Pay Bands (and Make Them Public)

• Instead of disclosing individual salaries, publish salary ranges for each job level so employees understand pay structures without obsessing over co-worker comparisons.

• Example: Google shares pay bands for job levels, ensuring salary expectations are clear without revealing individual paychecks.

🔹 Educate Employees on How Salaries Are Determined

• Transparency alone isn’t enough—employees need to understand why salaries differ based on skills, market demand, experience, and performance.

• Example: A consulting firm introduced "salary education sessions" where leadership explained how compensation decisions were made.

🔹 Commit to Pay Equity Audits

• Instead of simply publishing salaries, commit to regular pay audits to ensure fairness across gender, race, and tenure.

• Example: Salesforce conducts annual pay audits and publicly commits to closing any wage gaps.

🔹 Introduce Gradual Transparency

• If full transparency isn’t the right fit for your culture, ease into it—start with leadership salaries, then expand to broader pay band disclosures over time.

Should You Share Your Salary? The Leadership Question

One of the most debated aspects of pay transparency is whether leaders should disclose their own salaries.

Some executives argue that sharing their pay fosters trust and accountability. Others worry it will lead to resentment, especially in companies with significant pay gaps between leadership and employees.

Questions for Leaders to Consider:
✔️ Would sharing executive salaries help employees better understand pay structures?
✔️ Would disclosing my salary build trust—or trigger frustration?
✔️ How can I demonstrate fairness in pay without undermining morale?

For some organizations, partial transparency (such as sharing CEO pay ratios or leadership salary bands) is a middle ground that fosters trust without unnecessary disruption.

Pay Transparency: The Takeaway

Full pay transparency isn’t the only way to build trust—but zero transparency is no longer an option either. Employees expect openness about compensation structures, and organizations that resist all transparency risk losing trust, talent, and credibility.

The key is to find a balance:
✔️ Share salary bands instead of individual salaries.
✔️ Educate employees on how compensation decisions are made.
✔️ Commit to pay equity audits to ensure fairness.
✔️ Consider gradual transparency instead of all-or-nothing disclosure.

At the end of the day, transparency isn’t just about numbers—it’s about trust. The more open and clear your organization is about pay, the less employees will feel the need to guess, speculate, or assume the worst.

Question for Reflection:

Would full pay transparency improve trust in your organization, or would it cause unintended conflict? What’s one step you could take to improve transparency around pay structures?

This content pulls out insights from Culture Change Made Easy by Jamie Notter and Maddie Grant. See more resources at culturechangemadeeasybook.com. 

Ask us about bulk orders of print copies for your organization, or presenting ideas from the book at your next conference or staff retreat! Just reply to this email or visit propelnow.co.