The Hidden Costs of Lagging Transparency

Slow Decisions, Mistrust, and Frustration

Transparency isn’t just a “nice-to-have”—it’s essential for efficiency, trust, and employee engagement. When organizations fail to provide timely and clear communication, decision-making slows, employees disengage, and trust erodes. This post uncovers the hidden costs of lagging transparency, from wasted time to frustration-fueled turnover, and explores how leaders can create a culture of transparency that accelerates—not hinders—organizational success.

The Hidden Costs of Lagging Transparency—Slow Decisions, Mistrust, and Frustration

Leaders often assume that withholding or delaying information protects employees—whether it’s about organizational changes, financial realities, or future strategies. But in reality, lagging transparency causes more harm than good.

A lack of timely transparency doesn’t just create mild confusion—it actively slows down decision-making, fuels frustration, and weakens trust in leadership. Employees left in the dark spend valuable time seeking clarity, interpreting mixed signals, or speculating about what’s really happening behind the scenes.

In today’s fast-moving world, organizations can’t afford to let transparency lag.

The Hidden Costs of Lagging Transparency

A lack of timely, clear transparency causes problems across every level of an organization. Here are some of the biggest hidden costs:

1. Decision-Making Slows to a Crawl

When employees lack timely, relevant information, they can’t make informed decisions. They hesitate, wait for approvals, or delay projects because they’re unsure about leadership’s direction.

  • Example: A tech startup planning to expand into new markets kept its growth strategy under wraps to avoid premature leaks. But this lack of transparency meant the product and sales teams had no idea which markets to prioritize—leading to wasted resources and delayed execution.

  • The Cost: When employees don’t have the right information at the right time, projects stall, and opportunities slip away.

2. Mistrust Grows and Morale Drops

When transparency lags, employees assume the worst. Even when leadership has good intentions, silence breeds mistrust and disengagement. Employees start asking:
❌ What are they hiding?
❌ Do they not trust us with this information?
❌ Are things worse than they’re letting on?

  • Example: A nonprofit organization was struggling financially but delayed announcing budget cuts until the last minute. By the time leadership communicated the changes, employees were already demoralized and distrustful, leading to an exodus of top talent.

  • The Cost: Employees who don’t trust leadership disengage, gossip spreads, and attrition rises.

3. Employees Waste Time Hunting for Information

When organizations fail to provide clear and easily accessible information, employees waste time piecing together what they need from scattered emails, Slack messages, and secondhand conversations.

  • Example: A consulting firm with an ever-changing client strategy failed to document decisions properly. Consultants spent hours chasing down leadership for updates, leading to lost billable hours and frustration.

  • The Cost: Employees waste time seeking clarity instead of doing meaningful work.

4. Misinformation Spreads

When leaders don’t provide information, employees fill in the gaps themselves—often with incorrect or exaggerated assumptions.

  • Example: A healthcare company failed to communicate clearly about an upcoming leadership change. Without official transparency, rumors started flying about mass layoffs—causing unnecessary panic and resignations.

  • The Cost: False information spreads faster than the truth, creating chaos and unnecessary stress.

5. High Performers Leave in Frustration

Top employees want clarity, trust, and purpose. If an organization consistently leaves them in the dark, they will seek opportunities elsewhere.

  • Example: A product manager at a growing SaaS company was repeatedly blindsided by leadership decisions. After months of uncertainty, she took her expertise to a competitor with a more open and communicative leadership team.

  • The Cost: Retention suffers, and top talent leaves for organizations with stronger transparency.

How to Close the Transparency Gap

The good news? Organizations can reverse the damage of lagging transparency by making intentional shifts in how and when they communicate.

🔹 1. Make Transparency a Leadership Priority

  • Leaders should ask: What do employees need to know before they need to ask?

  • Example: Instead of waiting for employee town halls, a CEO at a fintech company proactively shares strategic updates monthly through a candid video message.

🔹 2. Share Information Earlier Than Feels Comfortable

  • Waiting until you have all the details means waiting too long. Share what you can—even if it’s incomplete.

  • Example: A retail company planning a major rebrand started sharing updates with employees six months in advance, allowing teams to adapt and align gradually instead of reacting at the last minute.

🔹 3. Create Clear, Accessible Information Hubs

  • Employees shouldn’t have to dig for information. Key updates should be easy to find.

  • Example: A global marketing agency built an internal transparency portal where teams could see real-time updates on company goals, financials, and leadership decisions.

🔹 4. Train Managers to Be Information Champions

  • Employees get most of their updates from managers, not executives. Make sure middle management is equipped to share transparent, accurate updates.

  • Example: A healthcare startup rolled out “transparency briefings” for managers, ensuring they could confidently answer team questions about company direction.

🔹 5. Encourage Two-Way Transparency

  • Transparency should be a dialogue, not a broadcast. Employees should feel comfortable asking questions and voicing concerns.

  • Example: A software company introduced anonymous “Ask Me Anything” (AMA) sessions with leadership, giving employees a safe space to seek clarity.

Transparency as an Asset, Not an Afterthought

Lagging transparency isn’t just a communication problem—it’s an operational and cultural risk. Organizations that fail to provide timely, clear, and accessible information will struggle with slow decisions, low trust, and disengaged employees.

By prioritizing proactive, structured transparency, companies don’t just build trust—they move faster, retain talent, and foster a culture where employees feel empowered rather than left in the dark.

Question for Reflection:

What’s one area in your organization where transparency tends to lag? How could improving transparency in that area speed up decision-making and reduce frustration?

This content pulls out insights from Culture Change Made Easy by Jamie Notter and Maddie Grant. See more resources at culturechangemadeeasybook.com

Ask us about bulk orders of print copies for your organization, or presenting ideas from the book at your next conference or staff retreat!

We can be reached via propelnow.co or simply by replying to this email.

Reply

or to participate.